banner



Do Independent Hotels Make More Money Than Franchised Hotels

In the hospitality sector, there are number of key players and stakeholders that involved to run a successful hotel. Hotel brands, hotel owners and management companies oft piece of work together to create transformations and combinations of operating models to maximize the profitability and increase invitee satisfaction. The question to the hotel possessor is that:"How to choose between a franchise operators' agreement or hotel management understanding?" and"What model is the nigh suitable for his/her hotel?". This article aims to give a short overview and comparison between the two hotel operating models.

1. Hotel Management Agreement (HMA)

Hotel make/operator will be responsible to manage the hotel by providing supervision, direction, and expertise through conventional methods and measures. It will fundamentally take over the operations of the hotel for and on behalf of the hotel owner for a fee.

Given this scenario, the hotel make (such as Marriott, IHG, Hilton, Accor/SBE) is the manager and the hotel owner is the managed owner. They signed a Hotel Management Agreement for a specific hotel make (such every bit Ritz Carlton, Sofitel). The hotel owner will bear all the operating risk. They also require paying a base of operations fees, make trademark, incentive fees, marketing fees, distribution and loyalty fees, It fees and many more than. Hotel management agreements can exist long and circuitous.

Hotel Management Agreement Advantages and Disadvantages

Source: HVS research— Photo by Farazad Group Ltd. Source: HVS research— Photo by Farazad Group Ltd.

Source: HVS research— Photo by Farazad Group Ltd.

ii. Franchise Operators Agreement

The franchise agreement is a legal license agreement betwixt the hotel make and the hotel owner that give hotel owner the rights and obligations to operate the hotel under the franchisor's make in substitution for fees.

Given this scenario, the Hotel Brand (such as Marriott, IHG, Hilton, Accor/SBE) is the franchisor, and the hotel owner is the franchisee. They sign a Franchise Agreement for a specific hotel brand (such as Ritz Carlton, Sofitel). The hotel owner volition bear all risks like HMA, simply they will hold control of the hotel asset. They likewise require paying a franchise fees, brand trademark, incentive fees, marketing fees, distribution and loyalty fees, IT fees and many more.

Franchise Operators Agreement Advantages and Disadvantages

Source: HVS research— Photo by Farazad Group Ltd. Source: HVS research— Photo by Farazad Group Ltd.

Source: HVS research— Photo past Farazad Grouping Ltd.

The two models described higher up provide a range of options with example of benefits and limitations that brand them more or less attractive depending on the requirement, priorities and profile of the hotel possessor. Moreover, the table below illustrate the comparisons between Franchise and Direction Contract in term of income, services provided by hotel brand, contract term, employees, financials commitment and other price.

Comparison of the two models

Source: HVS research— Photo by Farazad Group Ltd. Source: HVS research— Photo by Farazad Group Ltd.

Source: HVS research— Photo by Farazad Group Ltd.

Co-ordinate to HVS report in 2015, Franchise agreement accounted a hefty portion of major hotel chain'southward portfolio more than than in Europe as shown in the pie chart below. HVS as well noted that Franchise Understanding will almost certainly continue to rise due to the number of reasons "Franchising will likely go on to gain ground as the preferred operating model for a number of reasons: major chains have placed increasing emphasis on franchising to meet their desired expansion pace; Third Party Operators accept proven competent in bridging the gap between owners and brand companies; and small independent hotels in secondary locations turn to flexible, less-standardized franchisors to remain competitive."

Source: Farazad Group Ltd. Source: Farazad Group Ltd.

Source: Farazad Group Ltd.

In conclusion, in that location are several factors to determined which operating model is the right fit for the hotel. For instance, the experience and the risk appetite of the possessor, the size and standard of the hotel belongings, the suitability and availability of potential brands, etc.

However, all in all, management contract allows the owner to get into hotel industry even with limited experience to run hotel and enjoy the turn a profit when the business organisation is doing well. But this comes with the cost of greater operating and market risk while the hotel brand will bargain with all the management matters. On the other side of the argument, Franchise Understanding provide the owner the right to operate the hotel themselves under a brand name or flag and to take access to the technology capabilities, distribution and marketing systems in exchange for loyalty fees. This is appropriate for hotel owners who already have hotelier experience and want to have a daily interest operate their own hotel.

Korosh Farazad
Founder and Chairman of Farazad Group of Companies
Farazad Group Ltd.

Source: https://www.hospitalitynet.org/opinion/4099753.html

Posted by: sauermazint.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Do Independent Hotels Make More Money Than Franchised Hotels"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel